Photo courtesy of King's College London |
Nationalism,
as explained in The Post American World by
Fareed Zakaria (2012), is the pride a people has for its country. The fervor and tone of nationalism can range
from the enjoyment of simple national holidays to the horrors of the National
Socialist party (Nazis) of Germany during the 1940s. Americans cherish their nationalism, even
going so far as to rename it patriotism.
However, Americans ironically don’t seem to understand why other
populations may have similar feelings for their home. They are not always welcoming of a Western
power attempting to establish a new order. As Zakaria explains on page 35,
“When the United States involves itself abroad, it always believes that it is
genuinely trying to help other countries better themselves. From the Philippines and Haiti to Vietnam and
Iraq, the natives’ reaction to US efforts has taken Americans by surprise.”
What
should Americans should take by surprise is the nationalism China
displays. Its international relations
over the last 170 years have been tumultuous at best, and its recent growth and
international prestige has been seen as something to celebrate. As the The
Atlantic explains in its 2013 article “How Humiliation Drove Modern Chinese History”, China’s brutal defeat at the hands of Great Britain in the Opium Wars
began a “Century of Humiliation”.
Throughout the remainder of the 19th Century and until the
Communist Revolution of 1949, Western Powers exploited China both economically
and for land concessions. The article states that “only when Chairman Mao
Zedong stood atop Beijing's Gate of Heavenly Peace on October 1, 1949 and
proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China did this
‘century’—which actually lasted 109 years—come to an end.”
The
Atlantic article states that the term
fed into the party’s “founding mythology” and thus the people were socialized
to understand that their country had been shamefully exploited. Fast-forward to the modern day China. The country has seen significant economic
growth (an estimated seven percent per year minimum according to Broken BRICs by Ruchir Sharma). As more of a world economic power (which
holds $1.261 of US debt, per CNBC),
China has been more emboldened to act on territorial disputes with Japan. The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute where
there was a naval stand off between the two countries spawned nationalist
protests in China where per CNN
“thousands hurled bottles and eggs outside the Japanese Embassy in Beijing” and
others around the country ransacked Japanese shops. The Atlantic
article however makes the argument that at this point Chinese nationalism,
in the form of demonstrations, is something the Chinese government monitors
closely and allows for the purpose of “blowing off steam.”
Image Credit: Reuters |
The
discontent with those of Japanese descent runs deeper to Japanese occupation of
China during WWII. However these protest
directly exemplify Zakaria’s fear of nationalism. He argues that increased national identity
will result in increasingly differentiated worldviews thus making compromise
harder among nations. This can be seen
as a nationalistic China and Japan over how to solve common problems like the
territorial disputes or how to handle a nuclear North Korea, where China has
historically been a trading partner with the Hermit Kingdom while Japan has
aligned itself with US interests.
Inequality
in China has grown as its economy has grown.
In August 2014 The Journalist’s
Resource, produced by the Harvard Kennedy School, reported that five
percent of the country earned 23% of the income while the bottom 5% only took
home 0.1%. Additionally those who live
in urban settings bring home 2.33 times more income than their rural
counterparts. However, economic growth
in the country leads the World Bank to believe that “extreme poverty will be
eliminated in 2022” according to the article.
The real inequality in the country is that of political
representation. China does not formally
recognize any party other the Chinese Communist Party. Humans’ Rights Watch goes into great detail
over the governments’ violations. The
government “curtails” women’s’ reproductive rights, restricts religion to “approved”
places of worship, and forbids labor unions among a laundry list of other
issues. According to the HRW report,
there are those who speak out against governmental transgressions. However, significant policy change/civil
society action in the near future due to inequality is unlikely.
No comments:
Post a Comment